Showing posts with label Civil War. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civil War. Show all posts

Friday, June 19, 2020

Juneteenth

This is Juneteenth.

I had long known that on June 19th, 1865 -- Juneteenth -- the Emancipation Proclamation was announced in Texas.

That's the short version, of course, the "I learned it in elementary school" version. (Actually, I think it was in junior high.)

What I did not realize was that the man doing the announcing was General Gordon Granger. General Granger had been my great great grandfather's corps commander at the Battle of Chickamauga.

I'm not claiming any deep personal connection. It's unlikely General Granger had a clue who some random rifleman in Company K of the 22nd Michigan was, and G'G'Grandfather was still convalescing in a hospital in Detroit a year and a half after the battle, so he probably never saw Texas.

I think what impresses me more than the (tenuous) connection is the fact that, this morning, I actually learned something from a Pubic Service Announcement on TV.

Monday, November 19, 2018

On This Date...

...in 1863 President Abraham Lincoln stood up in Gettysburg, PA, and delivered what may be the greatest oration in American history:
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion—that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
Ironic to consider that it wasn't even supposed to be "the main event", which was supposed to be The Honorable Edward Everett's two hour long "Gettysburg Oration". The lesson there for public speakers is obvious.

Monday, May 28, 2018

Memorial Day, 2018

Or, Remembrance Day, or Decoration Day, depending on where and when you're from.




I don't now if this story is true -- I certainly never heard it before -- but I usually post a recording of "My Buddy"...





Sunday, May 25, 2014

Memorial Day, 2014


I've posted this song every Memorial Day since I began the blog, I think.  Still seems to sum it up best.


And it occured to me that this one fits, too, if one is in a maudlin, or even a morbid, mood...


And this, of course...

I've seen more people posting this year than ever before a message I've tried to tell folks, reminding them that Memorial Day is the day we remember those who didn't make it home. This is, I suppose, an inherently morbid fact.  The American Day of the Dead, if you will.

And, yes, we owe them, well, just about all the "blessings of liberty" we enjoy, even if we doubt whether the blessings are quite as abundant these days, or will last. 

We also owe it to them that those blessings do not disappear. And if that means getting maudlin when we reflect on those who have sacrificed all they had, and more, even if it was in a conflict the wisdom or righteousness we question, then so be it.


Sunday, May 18, 2014

Quickie Book Review, The Global Crisis

Global Crisis: War, Climate Change and Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century by Parker, Geoffrey (2013)

The subtitle says it all:  This is not just a book about the Thirty Years War or the English Civil Wars,  the Seventeenth Century was a time of upheaval all over and all around the world, not just through civil and religious wars, not just due to conquest and colonization, but also due to natural disaster (plagues, volcanoes, earthquakes) and through global climate change -- global cooling, to be precise.  (This books was the source of my post Ancient Wisdom, Revolting Peasants Edition)

Amazon's Blurb:
Revolutions, droughts, famines, invasions, wars, regicides, government collapses—the calamities of the mid-seventeenth century were unprecedented in both frequency and extent. The effects of what historians call the "General Crisis" extended from England to Japan, from the Russian Empire to sub-Saharan Africa. The Americas, too, did not escape the turbulence of the time.
In this meticulously researched volume, master historian Geoffrey Parker presents the firsthand testimony of men and women who saw and suffered from the sequence of political, economic, and social crises between 1618 to the late 1680s. Parker also deploys the scientific evidence of climate change during this period. His discoveries revise entirely our understanding of the General Crisis: changes in prevailing weather patterns, especially longer winters and cooler and wetter summers, disrupted growing seasons and destroyed harvests. This in turn brought hunger, malnutrition, and disease; and as material conditions worsened, wars, rebellions, and revolutions rocked the world.
Parker's demonstration of the link between climate change, war, and catastrophe 350 years ago stands as an extraordinary historical achievement. And the implications of his study are equally important: are we adequately prepared—or even preparing—for the catastrophes that climate change brings?
This is a pretty thick tome, 697 pages of text, 871 including appendices, bibliography, and index.  I had to extend the loan on it from the library to be able to finish it. It was well worth the time spent.

One thing that was striking to me was that the standard response to crop failures due to wars, rumors of wars, and the Maunder Minimum and it's ensuing Little Ice Age was to raise taxes on everything.  The governments that handled the disruption the best were those that lowered taxes, and offered tax relief and food and other support to communities that had all they could do to survive.

Oddly, to a Westerner's eyes, this means Moghul India and Tokugawa Japan.

A cynic might point out that this actually meant more government control over the ordinary person's life; another sort of cynic would point out that this is a mater of degree, especially when discussing the Tokugawa Shogunate.


Parker does not just rely on documentary evidence -- memoirs, diaries, government records -- but also consults the "natural record", such as ice cores, tree ring counts, and so forth, to include climate evidence in areas where there is no reliable record of events or conditions.

One point that is often brought up is how a reduction of temperature of  just one degree Celsius can shorten the growing season by weeks. Even if weather conditions are perfect for the shortened growing season (and when are they ever?), this shortened season can lead to shortages, if not outright famine.

One of the most valuable aspects of the book, in fact, is that it can also be viewed as a survey of actual global history of the period, covering as it does every continent (albeit there is no documentary record for Australia or Oceania, so the natural records must suffice) and most, if not all, nations. I will say, however, that many of the charts he includes that show things like income, population, or climate, are not necessarily related well to the text.

All in all, this is a valuable book, bringing together both historical and natural records from a variety of sources, and also covering areas that are often ignored as being "outside the scope" of other studies.  As I said, I felt it was well worth the time to read it.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

150 Years Ago...

The Civil War Trust has a nice animated guide to the Battle of Chickamauga up.

Very cool.

Aside from that whole "Great-Great-Grandfather's arm being blown off" thing. (See end of Section 10 of the animation, "The forgotten 22nd Michigan...")

Other links:

Past Cluemeter Posts:

Saturday, June 8, 2013

Hear him, hear him!

Daddy Bear on the whole FBI/NSA surveillance/wiretapping/email snooping scandal: Betrayal by Those Who Should Know Better | DaddyBear's Den
He says what I wanted to, but couldn't without devolving into incoherent profanity.

To give you an idea of where I am on this, we went to Ace Hardware earlier, and it was all I could do not to go price manila hemp rope.

Also, seen in comments at that post, not sure what to think about this: DHS insider: It’s about to get very ugly

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

History geek bleg

Was it O.O. Howard or George Rosencrantz who got a pre-Civil War reputation for an excessively bureaucratic personality  when, as Regimental Commander he requisitioned some supplies and then, as Regimental Quartermaster denied his own request?
Just ran into a situation at work that's reminiscent of that...

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

149 Years Ago Today...

Battle of Chickamauga - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

As I've posted several times before, my Great Great Grandfather was in the 22nd Michigan Volunteer Infantry Regiment, which was part of Steedman's (First) Divison, Granger's Reserve Corps of the Army of the Cumberland.

The 22nd Michigan was with General Thomas on Snodgrass Hill.

John Clem, AKA "Johnny Shiloh", was assigned to the 22nd Michigan, although the 22nd Michigan did not take part in the Battle of Shiloh. (In fact the regiment had not even been raised at the time; I suppose "Johnny Chickamauga" doesn't scan as well, not to mention the fact that Shiloh was a Union victory, more or less, while Chickamauga was a Union defeat.)

Perusing the records of the Adjutant General of the State of Michigan in the library in college, I found evidence that my Great2 Grandfather was discharged for wound, and may have had his left arm amputate. Family history does not substantiate that.

I thought it odd that the wounds were to his left arm, as I had read in several locations that the most common injury was to the right arm. This was ascribed to the habit of Civil War infantryman of lying prone and/or digging in or seeking cover behind rocks, trees, walls, etc.; the right arm would be exposed when reloading the muzzleloading rifles still in vogue.

Then I read that the Battle of Chickamauga was one of the few battles fought in heavily wooded areas, and the soldiers fought behind standing trees; their right arms were covered as they were when reloading, but the left arm was exposed when shooting. It turns out that the most common body part wounded during this battle was the left arm...
***
Thought I had written a post to be automagically posted today, but if I did, the Internet ate it.  
Previous posts:
The Clue Meter: Update to "Happy Birthday To Us"
The Clue Meter: On this date in 1863...
On this date, 1863...
Snodgrass Hill, Part II

Corrected title of post.  Stupid math. 

Monday, March 5, 2012

Tab Clearance

I'm so glad Tamara introduced me to this idea.  Sometimes I have so many noteworthy articles, but nothing to say.  Wait....

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Snodgrass Hill, Part II

Continued.
22nd Michigan Volunteer Infantry Regiment Monument, Snodgrass Hill
Found at.

Inscription:
MICHIGAN
TO HER
TWENTY-SECOND REGIMENT OF INFANTRY
COMMANDED BY
COLONEL HEBER LeFAVOUR
LIEUT. COLONEL WILLIAM SANBORN
CAPT. ALONZO M. KEELER
WHITAKER'S BRIGADE, STEEDMAN'S DIVISION, GRANGER'S CORPS
This monument marks the position where the regiment performed its most important service, Sept. 20th, 1863.
Casualties:
Engaged 455
Killed 32
Wounded 96
Missing 261
Total loss 389
On the 19th the regiment marched from Rossville joining the brigade near McAfee's Church. From thence it moved about noon of the 20th toward this position. After three hours desperate combat having exhausted their ammunition, they charged overwhelming numbers until overcome.
In the Chattanooga campaigns it performed important engineer service, Major Henry S. Dean, Commanding.
Monument #898
 That "march" from Rossville to McAfee's Church was 50 miles.  In a day.  On hardtack and salt pork, with gear that, while it didn't weigh anywhere near what a GI humps today, was significantly less ergonomic.  As I recall from the Regimental history I found in Eastern Michigan University's library, they marched without specific instructions:  This may have been the origin of the command "March to the sound of the guns."

Somewhere along the way they passed General Granger, who complimented Colonels LeFavour on the appearance of his "Brigade."  The Corps Commander is said to have expressed his admiration for a regiment that could arrive at a raging battle with few, if any, falling out.

I think I mentioned that I visited the battlefield about 20 years ago.  Where I stood next to the regiment's monument on Snodgrass Hill, I counted  6 or monuments to Confederate regiments.  Granted that, by this time, the average rebel regiment was about the size of a battalion, or smaller, they were still seriously outnumbered.  And effectively disarmed, out of ammo.

Monument to the Regiment's most famous member:


Also: Chickamauga Blog

On this date, 1863...

..Snodgrass Hill:
Three regiments that had been attached from other units—the 22nd Michigan, the 89th Ohio, and the 21st Ohio—were left behind without sufficient ammunition, and ordered to use their bayonets. They held their position until surrounded by Preston's division, when they were forced to surrender.

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

On this day in history...

...in 1861 the Confederacy opened fire on Fort Sumter.

The blood would flow for four more years.