Showing posts with label Wolverines. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Wolverines. Show all posts

Friday, December 13, 2013

Assorted Geekery

I don't usually purchase beer, wine, or hard liquor based solely on the label.  But sometimes a clever name or image on the label will induce me to look closer, and I'll then purchase it.

What geek could resist this beer?

A closer look at the label art:
Beer for warriors:
The "Khukuri" is a product of the UK, by the way...

Also, gun show tomorrow, so I decided I'd see what the ammo supply is like at local stores, so I'd know if any gun show "deals" really are.

Now, I'm not superstitious, but I will confess that I am as ready to jump on someone for "jinxing us" as the next guy.  Part of this stems from my Army days when, sure as shooting, some jackass would comment on how nice the weather was, and it would instantly turn to shit.  Or, they would complain about the weather, and it would turn shittier.  (We got rained on at Ft. Irwin and 29 Palms.  You think rain in the desert is a Good Thing? Try it when you're sleeping on the ground and living out of your rucksack...)

Conversely, if one everyone was truly prepared for crappy weather, it seemed like it would not appear. (Coincidence that"m posting this on Friday the Thirteenth...)

Anyway.  Last week I noticed that my nice rag wool, thinsulate, and gore-tex watchcap that I've had longer than I've known Mrs. Drang was falling apart.

And today I discovered that Sportsman's Warehouse now stocks Stormy Kromer caps.  At the risk of jinxing us, I will say that, now that I have a wool cap designed by a railroad engineer, and made in Ironwood, MI, it will probably never get below freezing here again...

Monday, February 18, 2013

Generations

No, not the silly Start Trek movie with Shat and Stew.

I'm talking about generations of the Gun Culture.

The topic arose on the WA-CCW Yahoo! email list, in connection with a young man who heads up an organization (or maybe "is", not clear how many members it has) called The Second Amendment Enforcers, and who is organizing what he calls a Day of Resistance to protest current gun control efforts.

Now, to backtrack a bit:
Gun Culture v1 was into shooting, yes, but the members were mostly hunters and target shooters, and maybe collectors.  Concealed carry was very much a thing based on a perceived "need", i.e., bankers, businessmen, people who handled cash, or other precious materials, or who had made political enemies, and might need to defend themselves.  Machine guns might be interesting devices, but really, who would need to own one? Silencers?  Short barreled rifles and sawed-off shotguns?  No way!  Cheap handguns, i.e. "Saturday Night Specials?  Obviously catering to the lower, urban--and usually ethnic--classes, and who cares?

Nowadays we call these guys--almost always "guys", and they're still around--"Fudds." They agree with Vice President Biden that a double barrel shotgun is the best for home defense, that a "military style rifle" is useless for hunting, and that the government must Do Something! to close the gun show, next-door-neighbor, and water-cooler loopholes on gun sales.

Gun Culture v1 watched the Federal government pass gun control legislation in 1934 (in response to gangsterism and racketeering) and 1968 (in response to political assassinations and wide-spread civil unrest) and said nothing --at least, nothing that could have been construed as critical of the acts.

Gun Culture v1 could be summed up in a remark attributed, possibly apocryphally, to Bill Ruger, that "No honest man needs a handgun smaller than a canned ham."

Gun Culture v2 arose in the aftermath of the 1960s and GCA '68, and started to take an active interest in the firearms in the context of the Second Amendment.  The actual term "Gun Culture v2" was coined by gun writer and media host Michael Bane.  In an interview he described the genesis of his show Gun Stories thus:
All guns have their stories. We used to pass those stories down from generation to generation, because that’s how the gun culture “spread.” But as the Elf Queen Galadriel in LORD OF THE RINGS noted, “The world is changing…” The gun culture is changing — profoundly and now very quickly. Think of the new gun culture as Version 2.0…it’s younger, more libertarian than what we might think of a social conservative, more female, with the primary drivers being concealed carry, the training community and the shooting sports. Gun culture Ver. 2.0 isn’t steeped in the lore of guns, and we thought it made sense to, essentially, pass along our cultural waypoints, our lore, our history to a new generation. We also wanted to tap this huge reservoir of knowledge among the Ver. 1.0 experts, essentially introducing them to the new generation of gun owner.
Gun Culture v2 is interested in owning guns for many reasons, self-defense, hunting, shooting, collecting, and, perhaps most of all, "Because I can!"

Gun Culture v2 is far more interedsted in firearms as a civil rights issue than GC 1 is/was.  Gun Culture v2 also tends to be more technically savvy, especially when it comes to use of social media.  (Although, as I often warn young punks who need to get off my lawn people, the tech they're using was invented by people my age, or older.) 

The term "Fudd" was coined by members of Gun Culture v2, and may backfire.  Tolerance, it's not just for school and work!1

The "Zumbo-ing" of Jim Zumbo -- who came to personify the Fudd side of GC v1 by dissing the use of "terrorist" (AR-type) rifles in hunting -- was largely the work of GC v2. 

Is there a need for a Gun Culture v32? I don't honestly think so. I think it would be far to easy to think of this issue in terms of actual generations, as if young shooters shouldn't trust any shooter over 30.  Note that my home-boy Ted Nugent3 was instrumental in opening Jim Zumbo's eyes to the varied sorting uses of Ar15s.

The Gun Culture will continue to evolve, as society evolves, but, frankly, while many of the younger members of GC v2 have far more ink and shrapnel in their bodies piercings than some of us old farts are comfortable with, and you can't hardly call that noise "music", at this point in time, at least, the interests -- and concerns -- are the same.
***
Notes:
1. Gun Culture 1.0 v. Gun Culture 2.0 and More on Gun Culture 2.0, both
2. It’s Time for Gun Culture 3.0 | Gun Nuts Media
3.  I graduated from the same high school Ted did, about a decade later.
***
Some links:
Google search: gun culture 2.0.
The new gun culture | Conservative News, Views & Books
Gun Culture 2.0, Internet Zero - Misfires And Light Strikes
A podcast: Down Range Radio #245: Year 2011 and Gun Culture 2.0 | Down Range TV

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Move, Shoot, Communicate

Whilst perusing the Archives at Instapundit, I came across this post: Instapundit » Blog Archive » BOB OWENS: For ‘A Well-Regulated Militia,’ What Firearms, Gear, and Skills Should You Own?…

So, herewith some thoughts...

My assumption here is that the "unorganized militia" will basically be a well-armed, equipped, and trained neighborhood watch.  Anything larger (city- or county-wide) would pretty much cease to be "unorganized."

So, what do I mean by "unorganized"?  I don't think it means "disorganized" so much as "informally organized"; like a neighborhood watch, there will be people who take responsibility for things like putting together meetings, for example, but there is no official organization or hierarchy.  To take a local example, the Seattle suburb Renton may have the "Renton Rangers", but they will not have battalions, companies and platoons commanded by colonels, captains, and lieutenants.

Probably, if someone tries to establish any such thing there will soon be a rival Renton militia...

I do think a neighborhood watch model works best for this, since the primary role will be emergency/disaster response, internal security, and homeland defense.  There will probably be at least a semi-official relationship with the local city and/or county Emergency Management Office.  (I would suggest that part of the requirement would be completion of CERT training.)  There would be a roster, and the members might agree on a uniform--cap and vest?--but any given event will have members missing because they had to work, or the honey-do list was too long, or the kid wanted to go fishing...

In fact, I think it highly likely that militia members will see more use in natural or man-made disasters or emergencies than in responding to an enemy attack or civil unrest. (Ignoring that a terrorist attack is now defined "man-made disaster.")

Another point is that there is no statutory  coverage for the Unorganized Militia until Titles 10 or 32 of the United States Code.

Anyway.  The title of this post breaks down the three basic necessities of any military unit; while an unorganized (or even an organized one) is not usually considered to be exactly "military", and an unorganized militia will be operating close to home, these needs still apply.
*
Move:  While, for individual members, this would seem to require physical fitness, frankly, I see no reason why a citizen volunteer who needs braces or a power chair to get around couldn't serve as well.
  • There is certainly no PT test required for membership in a neighborhood watch, nor to participate in CERT training, or for membership in an amateur radio ARES/RACES group.
  • The individual member may not move so well, but that does not mean that he or she has nothing to contribute, nor that the group as a whole can't get around.
  • Not to say that the use of vehicles, either motor or people-powered, should be ignored, of course!  Specific needs will depend on where the militia is: In an urban area most action (patrols, etc.) will probably be on foot, and vehicles will be used for logistical support, or maybe rapid-response.
  • Another--perhaps primary--consideration here is thorough knowledge of your area: routes in, routes out, obstacles, resources. 
Militia members should be able to read a map and to navigate, on foot or in a vehicle, on roads and across country, with compass and GPS.  They may never operate outside of their militia's immediate area or responsibility, but can one really be sure?  
*
Shoot:  Mr. Owens suggests that each militia member should be armed with an AR15, magazines and means of carrying same, and 1000 rounds of ammunition.  Since what we're talking about is an unorganized militia, I don't really think it's altogether reasonable to call for a specific weapon.  Rather, members should be expected to arm themselves, to include ammunition and maintenance equipment, with a rifle.
  • A specific militia may decide to standardize on a specific model of rifle, and/or caliber, but they need to be wary of running people off by expecting them to spend extra money.
  • There may be a role for a shotgun as a primary long arm.
  • Some potential members may not be able to shoot a long arm at all.  (See my comments on fitness/physical ability above.)
  • Some militias are going to have to face the question as to whether people with scruples against bearing arms have a place in their group.
  • If a standard long arm is agreed upon, sidearms should be left to the tastes of the individual members.
I am not criticizing Mr. Owens' choice of the AR15 as the standard arm of the militia, I'm just saying that, what with the unorganized militia being unorganized, this may be a bridge too far...

Mr. Owens recommends the Army Qualification Test for militia members marksmanship training/qualification; I am sure he will be glad to hear that I concur.  Among other things, a 25-meter range can easily be put together in a gravel pit or open field with suitable backstop, using easily portable supplies.  Hopefully, the militia will have qualified Range Safety Officers, as well as instructors.  (In this context, I highly recommend the NRAs Instructor Programs.)
*
Communicate: Obviously, as an amateur radio operator, I see a role for ham radio in the militia...

...or do I?   I think this depends on what role the militia is filling, and where it serves.  For most purposes, a simple FRS or GMRS radio should fill the bill.  These have the virtue of being readily, cheaply, available in blister packs (although GMRS requires an $85 license fee, good for five years.)
  • They're not secure, but unless and until a militia is formally taken into government service, anything resembling strong encryption in radio communications is not allowed by the Federal Communications Commission anyway.
  • FRS requires no license; GMRS licensing requires no training or testing.
  • As noted, these units are widely, and cheaply, available.  There are table-top units, and GMRS radios built into GPS.
Of course, a handheld amateur radio transceiver operating in the 144, 225, or 440 MHz range, is far more versatile.  You can also get a multi-band transceiver which operates in the six meter band, which offers the ability to communicate with military VHF equipment.

Some militias may want to experiment with codes and ciphers; they are warned (again) that the FCC frowns on their usage on radio bands set aside for public use, so if they want to practice their use, they should do so using, say, cell phones to simulate radios.

Speaking of which, for most purposes in which I visualize the militia being active, the cell phone may well be the most practical form of communication, both text and voice.

"Administrative" communications will, of course, mostly be by email, probably a form of listserv or email list.  Depending on the technical abilities of the members of the militia, we would expect to see blogs, boards, chat sites, and pages or sites in the various social media.
*
In addition to having a rifle and ammunition, and knowing how to use them, Mr. Owens also recommends the following:
  • appropriate seasonal clothing
  • a first aid kit (preferably an individual first aid kid, or IFAK)
  • food, water, and temporary shelter for three days
The first aid kit is important; obviously, we want all members of the militia to have first aid training, preferably Red Cross  or (perhaps better) NOLS Wilderness certification. EMT training is probably too much to realistically expect.

I would add many of FEMA's Incident Command System courses, many of which are available on-line.  The classes on Hazardous Materials and Radiological Hazards obviously recommend themselves, as do courses on specific hazards which may effect your area.  (Depending on where you live, you may be able to get these classes in a classroom environment through your local emergency management department.)

***
NOTES:
Mr. Owens' original post: PJ Media » For ‘A Well-Regulated Militia,’ What Firearms, Gear, and Skills Should You Own?
 It Takes a Militia, an article Professor Reynolds co-authored advocating a "communitarian" basis for a militia, which seems to be what Mr. Owens is writing about.  Referenced in the original Instapundit post that started this.
Also seen at Instapundit: Kenyans take up weapons to save wildlife, tourism | StarTribune.com.  Former poachers form a "conservation militia" to fight poaching.
Daddy Bear recently posted a five-part series of vignettes, comprising a short-short story about WWIII, in which the unorganized militia, as well as "Home Guards", played a role:

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Wolverines!!!

Zachary Lehman takes two Asian exchange students to see the remake of Red Dawn'Red Dawn' Doles Out Tea Party Patriotism.   (h/t Instapundit.)

I'm not gonna lie: I have low expectations, especially since the production caved in and remade it was north Korea as the bad guys!  But I've seen a few reviews that say that, if you can mentally substitute ChiComs for norks, it's pretty good.  So maybe I'll see it after all.