Semantics triggers opposition to I-594’s gun-sale checks | Local News | The Seattle Times
Because for us to say that, where Ballot Initiative 594 says
Amazing, not only do the 1%'ers supporting this crap think only people who can afford to hire private security should have non-.gov guns to defend them, but they also think we're stupid.
Because for us to say that, where Ballot Initiative 594 says
‘Transfer’ means the intended delivery of a firearm to another person without consideration of payment or promise of payment including, but not limited to, gifts and loansthat it really means "selling a gun over the internet."
Amazing, not only do the 1%'ers supporting this crap think only people who can afford to hire private security should have non-.gov guns to defend them, but they also think we're stupid.
No comments:
Post a Comment