Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Leadership. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 31, 2020

This is getting old...


It's doesn't help that my job is a critical one, and I still have to go to work. I can telework, but that means that means I simply do my regular duties with different furniture, including cats. Not a lot of sitting back and watching movies, reading, social media, binge-watching trashy shows on Netflix, day drinking...

Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Alabama

Expanded upon from elsewhere, because, as Tamara likes to say, why waste it at an away game?

I'm laughing at all the people acting like Roy Moore was the GOP-anointed candidate for Alabama's Senator.

They clearly paid no attention to this race until last week.

I have spent little time in Alabama, too little to parse these events from the POV of a resident of The Heart of Dixie, but I have some thoughts on what this means, (some supplied or inspired by others):

  • The US Senate is now 51 (R) 49 (D). 
    • Since Harry Reid introduced "The Nuclear Option", this means less than it might.
  • Long will be a two-year Senator. Alabama is still the reddest of states
  • The Ds cannot, now, accuse the Rs of harboring a pedophile. (Whether you believe those claims about Moore or not.) I expect Franken will be out in the coming days, not weeks.
  • Steve Bannon's influence is much diminished, if not completely eliminated. He owns this.
  • I've been seeing items to the effect that Mike Pence, not Donald Trump, is the head of the GOP. 
    • Normally, the sitting president is considered the head of the party, but Obama had little or no interest (or was an even bigger SCOAMF than we thought) and Trump has little or no influence over the GOP, being an outsider. (Arguably, being an outsider is what got him elected.) 
    • So the question is, can Mike Pence take the bull by the horns elephant by the tusks and force them into a coherent, effective strategy?
  • The Seventeenth Amendment to the United States Constitution should be repealed. 
    • Ironically, it was implemented in Alabama before it became national...
  • Any suggestion that the mainstream media is even remotely impartial and unbiased should be met with derision and howls of laughter, followed by "...oh, wait. You're serious. Maybe you should get that looked at." 
  • (Addendum)  Part of the objection to Roy Moore seems to be that he was removed from the bench for allowing his religious convictions to interfere with his judicial decisions.
    • If Judicial activism is wrong for Conservative Christians, it is wrong for Progressive... Progressives. 
    • Granted if it wasn't for double standards the left would have no standards at all.
    • Time for a revival of A Man For All Seasons, perhaps. (I prefer the Charlton Heston version, for esthetic reasons. The Scoville version is probably more likely to get a hearing these days, though...)
I have no great love for Trump, but he is still a vast improvement over either Sanders or (shudder!) Clinton.

I have even less love for Roy Moore. His emails go directly to my spam folder, where they belong.

I don't know if his personal politics go over well in Alabama these days, but I do know they do not play well on the national stage. (FWIW, I noted that while in Alabama this past September on my way to Florida for a date with Irma, I saw only one sign for Judge Moore, and that was handmade.)

I'm not sure the fact that he has (or had) a habit of dating women young enough to be his daughters matters; I note that the "evidence" of his one alleged relationship with an underage woman is, to say the least, dubious. (And is now admitted to have been altered. Anyone who actually used the term "pedophile" should probably be leery of lawsuits, just sayin'...)

I do know that this election in and of itself is not a great victory for the left, and hardly spells the death knell for the right. There are aspects of this election, however, that could be symptoms of just what is wrong with politics in the USA.

I am glad I live in a country where we can hash these things out in public without resorting to wholesale violence.

So far.

Saturday, July 18, 2015

Not Enough

Senate Republican will roll out bill to arm troops at military facilities | TheHill
Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) will introduce legislation allowing troops to carry guns on military facilities, in the wake of a shooting in Tennessee that left four Marines dead. 
Johnson's office said the Wisconsin Republican, who chairs the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, will offer a proposal that would get rid of regulatory hurdles prohibiting troops from carrying firearms on military installations.
It's not going to be enough for Congress to "get rid of regulatory hurdles", they need to overcome the inertia of the Brass who are so risk-averse that the idea of a soldier having a gun under less than strictly controlled circumstances causes pants-shitting hysteria.

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

One Hundred Fifty Years Ago Today...

President Abraham Lincoln gave The Gettysburg Address
Four score and seven years ago, our fathers brought forth on this continent a new nation: conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. 
Now we are engaged in a great civil war. . .testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated. . . can long endure. We are met on a great battlefield of that war. 
We have come to dedicate a portion of that field as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. 
But, in a larger sense, we cannot dedicate. . .we cannot consecrate. . . we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember, what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. 
It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us. . .that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion. . . that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain. . . that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. . . and that government of the people. . .by the people. . .for the people. . . shall not perish from the earth.

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

QOTD, 07/30/2013

Seen on Facebook, from Libertarianism.org:
There are men, in all ages, who mean to exercise power usefully; but who mean to exercise it. They mean to govern well; but they mean to govern. They promise to be kind masters; but they mean to be masters.
Daniel Webster
From Wikiquote: Daniel Webster, attributed to "a speech delivered at Niblo’s Saloon, in New York, on the 15 of March, 1837", also found in The Works of Daniel Webster, Boston, Charles C. Little and James Brown, 1851, vol. 1, p. 358.

Friday, July 5, 2013

I did not know that. (Alt. title "Holy. Crap.")

h/t Dad.
F-16 pilot was ready to give her life on Sept. 11 - The Washington Post
And you figure, "Well, yeah, of course she was."
Ha!

Late in the morning of the Tuesday that changed everything, Lt. Heather “Lucky” Penney was on a runway at Andrews Air Force Base and ready to fly. She had her hand on the throttle of an F-16 and she had her orders: Bring down United Airlines Flight 93. The day’s fourth hijacked airliner seemed to be hurtling toward Washington. Penney, one of the first two combat pilots in the air that morning, was told to stop it.

The one thing she didn’t have as she roared into the crystalline sky was live ammunition. Or missiles. Or anything at all to throw at a hostile aircraft.
Except her own plane. So that was the plan.

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

"How To Thank A Soldier"

How To Thank A Soldier, By George W. Bush

Please note that this is not an article by George W. Bush, but a photo-essay consisting of images of George W. Bush interacting with The Troops.  The images are, however, from the George W. Bush Archives.
Reliable sources (some of whom have personal knowledge) tell me that our previous Commander in Chief often visited the troops, and especially made a point of visiting the wounded,but usually -- by preference --  did so with little or not fanfare, minimal entourage, and no media attention. 

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Peeves

"Moving forward."
I hate that phrase.
I'm not sure why it irks me as much as it does, but of all the modern management catch phrases, this one, more than any other, is guaranteed to get me an ass-chewing after a staff meeting, when I can't help but grimace.
"Moving forward"?  But we're not talking about something that moves. 
Why not just say "From now on"?  Or "In the future"? 
Sounds passive-voice to me, and I've been drilled to avoid passive voice whenever possible. 
Or maybe it's just that modern management fads piss me off generally.

Monday, April 8, 2013

RIP, Baroness Thatcher -- Updated

Margaret Thatcher - Wikipedia

Quotes:
  • I wish I could say that the Chancellor of the Exchequer had done himself less than justice. Unfortunately, I can only say that I believe he has done himself justice. Some Chancellors are macro-economic. Other Chancellors are fiscal. This one is just plain cheap. 
  • If a Tory does not believe that private property is one of the main bulwarks of individual freedom, then he had better become a socialist and have done with it.  
  • And I will go on criticising Socialism, and opposing Socialism because it is bad for Britain — and Britain and Socialism are not the same thing. (...) It’s the Labour Government that have brought us record peace-time taxation. They’ve got the usual Socialist disease — they’ve run out of other people’s money. 
  •  A man's right to work as he will, to spend what he earns, to own property, to have the State as servant and not as master: these are the British inheritance. They are the essence of a free economy. And on that freedom all our other freedoms depend. 
  • I hate extremes of any kind. Communism and the National Front both seek the domination of the state over the individual. They both, I believe crush the right of the individual. To me, therefore, they are parties of a similar kind. All my life I have stood against banning Communism or other extremist organisations because, if you do that, they go underground and it gives them an excitement that they don't get if they are allowed to pursue their policies openly. We'll beat them into the ground on argument... The National Front is a Socialist Front. 
  • To those waiting with bated breath for that favourite media catchphrase, the U-turn, I have only one thing to say: You turn if you want to. [laughter] The lady's not for turning.  
UPDATE: That last may be her most famous, of course, but I like this one, which I've seen at a couple of other sitres:
"If you just set out to be liked, you would be prepared to compromise on anything at any time and you would achieve nothing."  - 1989, commenting on her 10th anniversary as prime minister.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

GOAL Post 2013-4

FROM: GOAL [goalwa@cox.net]
SUBJECT: GOAL Post 2013-4
SENT: Fri 2/8/2013 9:45 PM

 Legislative Update from Olympia
  • ·         SEVERAL NEW BILLS FILED
  • ·         TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED
  • ·         TURNOUT NEEDED IN OLYMPIA
At least eight new gun bills were filed, good and bad.  HB 1676 by Rep. Ruth Kagi (D-32) is another mandatory safe storage bill similar to the 1997 "Whitney Graves" bill.  HB 1703 by Rep. Laurie Jinkins (D-27) is interesting: it imposes a $25 tax per transfer of any firearm, as well as a tax of one cent per round of ammunition sold... to fund a state-developed firearms safety training program.  Between this and HB 1588/SB 5625, that's a $45 tax on EVERY firearm transferred.  HB 1729 by Rep. Judy Warnick (R-13) adds penalties to street gang members found with firearms, and HB 1788 by Rep. Liz Pike (R-18) would allow qualified school personnel to carry on campus.

On the Senate side, SB 5604 by Sen. Brian Hatfield (D-19) would authorize an NRA license plate.  (I'll just say it once: I believe we'd be better off with a generic "Second Amendment" plate -- it's harder to criticize the Bill of Rights.)  SBs 5625 and 5711 by Sen. Adam Kline (D-37) are similar to HB 1588 -- they require ALL firearm transfers to be conducted by an FFL or by law enforcement, with resulting record keeping (de facto registration) AND a $20 transfer fee (tax).  SB 5635, also by Sen. Kline, makes it harder for firearm rights to be restored. 

Two public hearings are scheduled for next week.  On Wednesday, 13 February at 8:00 a.m., the House Judiciary will take public testimony on HBs 1147, 1588, 1612 and 1676.  On Friday, 15 February also at 8:00 a.m., the Senate Law & Justice Committee will conduct a public hearing on SB 5479.  

If at all possible, PLEASE try to attend the House Judiciary hearing on Wednesday.  It's important that we get as large a pro-gun turn-out as possible to demonstrate our opposition to HBs 1588 and 1676.  HB 1588, especially, as it creates a de facto gun registration system in Washington.  There are ways to conduct background checks that DO NOT retain data on the transfer.  If they want background checks, run a pure background check bill.  If they want registration, call it that and let's debate it.

If you can't attend the hearing, please write to your Representatives AND to the members of the Judiciary Committee and go on record with your opposition to these two bills.  Links to legislator contact information:

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

QOTD, 01/30/2013

Joe Rogan (@joerogan) on Twitter:

Suit (to be) filed against NY gun law

TO: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
...
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that THE NEW YORK STATE RIFLE & PISTOL
ASSOCIATION, THE WESTCHESTER COUNTY FIREARMS OWNERS ASSOCIATION, THE
SPORTSMEN’S ASSOCIATION FOR FIREARMS EDUCATION, INC., and AR15.COM LLC, by and through their counsel, GOLDBERG SEGALLA, LLP, hereby serve notice that they intend to file a claim against THE STATE OF NEW YORK pursuant to General Municipal Law section 50-e....
...
I. TIME & PLACE WHERE CLAIM(S) AROSE
The claims of the plaintiffs arose with the passage of legislation on January 14th, 2013, (identified as New York Senate Bill 2230, New York Assembly Bill 2388, and collectively known as “the New York Secure Ammunition and Firearms Act (“NY SAFE Act”))...
...
II. NATURE OF CLAIM(S)
Plaintiffs claim that passage and enforcement of the aforementioned legislation:
A. violates their fundamental constitutional rights to lawfully possess, keep, bear and use firearms for self-defense and other lawful purposes;
B. violates their constitutional rights to privacy;
C. impermissibly interferes with and infringes upon their fundamental constitutional rights to travel both intra-state and inter-state with lawfully possessed firearms;
D. unconstitutionally criminalizes and bans the possession of certain firearms, ammunition and large capacity feeding devices that were legally possessed prior by plaintiffs prior to the legislation’s passage and enforcement, and in which the plaintiff’s had a cognizable property interest. The outright criminalization and ban of these firearms, ammunition and large capacity feeding devices amounts to a deprivation and taking of them by the State of New York under color of law and without due process or just compensation. As such, passage and enforcement of the NY SAFE Act effectuates an unconstitutional taking of private property under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution;
E. unlawfully and unconstitutionally imposes restrictions on the ability of the plaintiffs to conduct business on both inter-state and intra-state levels with the designers of, manufacturers of, sellers of, distributors of, and purchasers of certain firearms, ammunition, and large capacity feeding devices, all in violation of the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution;
F. deprives the plaintiffs of life, liberty and/or property without due process of law, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution;
G. deprives the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution;
H. was passed and is being continuously enforced with the ongoing tortious intent to harass, harm, impede, interfere with, disrupt, interrupt, and/or destroy the present and future business and commercial activities of those plaintiffs who engage in the design of, manufacture of, distribution of, sale of, possession of, and/or training in the safe and lawful use of firearms, ammunition, and/or large capacity feeding devices; and
I. the legislation is impermissibly vague and overbroad.
III. ITEMS OF DAMAGE / INJURIES SUSTAINED
A. Violation of rights guaranteed to the plaintiffs by the U.S. Constitution and the New York State Constitution.
B. Deprivation of property rights and property values.
C. Interference with business relations, business activities, and business contracts relating to the design of, manufacture of, distribution of, sale of, possession of, and/or training in the safe and lawful firearms, ammunition, and/or large capacity feeding devices.
IV. AMOUNT OF DAMAGES TO WHICH PLAINTIFFS ARE ENTITLED
Plaintiffs are not seeking monetary damages. Plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief against the ongoing enforcement of the NYS SAFE Act, and declaratory relief the NYS SAFE Act is unconstitutional.

Monday, January 21, 2013

NY Dems beg Republican NOT to publish their wish list

If you're on Facespace, here's a link to NY Assemblyman Steve McLaughlin's Facebook post in which he links to a You Tube video (below) and lists the things the New York Assembly Democrats wanted on the recent NY Gun Grab, but decided to hold off on. 
This bill was an attack on the 2nd amendment and the Democrats clearly wanted to dismantle the work of the Founding Fathers. None of these amendments were included in the final bill thanks to us fighting back. I will not stand silent while these unpatriotic proposals are pathetically thrown at us a 11 o’clock at night:

1. Confiscation of "assault weapons"
2. Confiscation o ten round clips
3. Statewide database for ALL Guns
4. Continue to allow pistol permit holder's information to be replaced to the public
5. Label semiautomatic shotguns with more than 5 rounds or pistol grips as "assault weapons”
6. Limit the number of rounds in a magazine to 5 and confiscation and forfeiture of banned magazines
7. Limit possession to no more than two (2) magazines
8. Limit purchase of guns to one gun per person per month
9. Require re-licensing of all pistol permit owners
10. Require renewal of all pistol permits every five years
11. State issued pistol permits
12. Micro-stamping of all guns in New York State
13. Require licensing of all gun ammo dealers
14. Mandatory locking of guns at home
15. Fee for licensing, registering weapons

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

QOTD, Mayday Edition

If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not the legislators and their appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind?
Frédéric Bastiat

I'm guessing "B", Fred.

Monday, December 26, 2011

QOTD, 12/26/2011

Except it was posted several days ago, not sure how I missed it.
Chris:
...We're against people who want to run things.

It's from one of his mega-posts, so you really need to Go Read The Whole Thing.

Tuesday, December 13, 2011

Philosophical differances

So, catching up on the RSS feeds I've neglected for over a week1, I see that, in No, Children, A .32 “Mouse Gun” Isn’t Really Mousy, Bill commented
Isn’t it weird that in those days, people considered a .32 perfectly sufficient as a military weapon?
I think he misses what today's military would refer to as a difference in doctrine, but which has it's root in philosophy:  Americans were used to the thought of a pistol as a combat weapon, and they expected their officers (and pistol-armed specialists,  AND law enforcement personnel) to actually use them that way.  Europeans, on the other hand, saw pistols as badges of rank, to be used, if at all, to enforce discipline.  Note British officers who "went over the top" in WWI equipped with nothing more dangerous than a swagger cane and a stiff upper lip.

That, in part, is what made the US Military deciding to adopt a 9mm pistol "for caliber commonality with NATO allies"  such a joke:  Not only do you have to be sharing a fighting position with a NATO ally for it to matter, he has to have a pistol.

***
1.  A lot of the blogs I read, I access directly. 
2.  Which links to View From The Porch: They don’t make ‘em like they used to…  by Tamara.

Monday, December 5, 2011

ring ring!

Me: Hello?

VOICE:  Please hold for an important message from Newt Gingrich.

Me: ?

CALLER ID:  "Newt 2012."

*click*

Okay, Perry has been performing poorly abysmally, Cain imploded, Bachman's turns out to be a loon, and who knows anything about Santorum and Huntsman?  Sarah's not running, and probably never will, although we can hope.  And Romney may as well BE Obama!  So, yeah, it'll probably be Newt.*

Damnit.

I'm really not happy about it, he has supported Big Government stuff before, and his Contract with America never really panned out.  Plus, frankly, the fact that he's got the biggest brain in the room (although when everybody in the room's a politician that's not necessarily saying a lot) doesn't fill me with confidence.  I know some people think that's great.  I've sen too many really smart people convince themselves that their really stupid ideas were brilliant--and, believe me, you haven't seen really stupid until you've seen MI geek stupid.  (They don't usually get in trouble, but when they do...)

What I'm hoping for is that Gingrich will pick up Perry for his Veep, which will give Perry some experience and polish.

And then, when Palin announces her third party run in 2016, he jumps ship and they destroy both the Party of Evil AND the Party of Stupid.

EDIT:   *Yeah, I forgot Ron Paul.  You know what?  Forget that loon.  Every time he starts making sense, he has to balance it out by being even more clueless about foreign policy than Obama, as unlikely as that sounds.